Progressives should be pushing to defund or abolish the Canadian military. But, first we need to stop bolstering its capacity to kill in U.S. and NATO lead wars.
Yesterday the Canadian Foreign Policy Institute and Canadian Voice of Women for Peace released a public letter opposing Canada's plan "to spend tens of billions of dollars on unnecessary, dangerous, climate destroying fighter jets." Signatories include Canadian musicians Neil Young, Teagan and Sarah and Sarah Harmer as well as environmentalists David Suzuki and Naomi Klein.
The "no new fighter jets for Canada" statement is also signed by authors Michael Ondaatje, Yann Martel and Gabor Maté as well as sitting MPs, former MPs, city councillors, a senator, MPP and former UN ambassador. Prominent international figures such as Roger Waters, Daryl Hannah and Noam Chomsky have also backed a call addressed to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
The jets are expected to cost about $19 billion but the full life-cycle cost of the planes will be closer to $77 billion. These resources could fund clean drinking water on reserves, an exhaustive search of all unmarked graves at residential "schools" and plenty of Indigenous-run co-operative housing. Or: "$77 billion could turbocharge a just transition away from fossil fuels," notes the letter.
While the letter highlights better ways to use the resources, it also points out that "purchasing new jets will entrench fossil-fuel militarism." Fighter jets consume large amounts of heavy carbon emitting fuel and their high-altitude release point increases the climatic effect.
But, the primary reason to oppose fighter jets is their violent nature.
"Canada's current fleet of fighter jets has bombed Libya, Iraq, Serbia and Syria," notes the letter. "Many innocent people were killed directly or as a result of the destruction of civilian infrastructure and those operations prolonged conflicts and/or contributed to refugee crises."
Purchasing cutting edge new fighter jets will enhance the Canadian military's capacity to kill alongside the most violent nation the world has ever seen. In essence, the planned jet procurement will channel massive amounts of public resources into one of the most destructive parts of the military, which is among the most damaging elements of our government.
While a vitally important campaign, stopping the fighter jet procurement is a rearguard action. We need to defund the military, which sucks up $30 billion a year.
In his near-successful campaign to lead the Green Party of Canada, Dimitri Lascaris proposed reducing military spending by half. At the recent NDP convention, one resolution called for "the phasing out of the Canadian Armed Forces."
Despite the commonly held view that states should have militaries, about 20 countries don't have an active military force. They are mostly small Caribbean or South Pacific island nations, but the list also includes Costa Rica, Iceland and Panama. If the Canadian Forces were abolished, Canada would still have a coast guard, border services agency, municipal police forces and the quasi paramilitary RCMP.
Slashing military spending in half or abolishing the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) is important. But, the 100,000 Canadians (70,000 active soldiers and 30,000 reservists) in the force, as well as the 25,000 individuals working for the Department of National Defence require alternative employment and ways to contribute socially.
How about training some soldiers to clean the huge amounts of ordnance, chemicals and other waste from bases as part of advancing reconciliation with first peoples? Once properly cleared, some of the land could be returned to First Nations; a great deal of Indigenous land was taken to build bases. The CAF could return 500 or 1000 square kilometres a year of its 20,000 square kilometers land over a decade or two, which would still leave it with about half the landmass of Switzerland.
It is also imperative to convert weapons production. Again, those producing arms require more socially and ecologically sustainable employment. In some instances, this may be relatively straightforward. A light armoured vehicle production line can be rejigged to assemble buses, for instance. But, new plants and significant retraining may be required in other instances.
Progressives should be pressing to defund the military. But, first let's block efforts to strengthen its capacities to drop bombs in U.S.- and NATO-led wars.
Yves Engler is the author of 11 books. His Stand on Guard For Whom? — A People's History of the Canadian Military is available next month.
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.