It was magnificent. After three weeks of online and off line organizing, tens of thousands of people across generations and political persuasions took to the streets in 65 cities and towns across the country and around the world to stop the erosion of democracy in Canada.
Organized mostly by activists in their 20s, using the tools of social media to reach each other across the vast distances of land and political discourse. they found that tens of thousands of Canadians really do want their voices to be heard in the democratic process. Prime Minister Harper made the mistake of pride and arrogance so often the downfall of autocratic leaders by saying that Canadians wouldn't care that he shut down Parliament. That's what really pissed them off.
The protests had enough of an impact that you have no doubt seen the TV news and reports from mainstream media, as well as on Facebook, Twitter and rabble.ca. But I am enough of an old leftie to think an analysis of its significance is useful.
As I said in my speech to the Toronto rally the method of organizing this rally was completely unprecendented in Canada. Activists in Europe have been using networking through social media and text messaging for a few years now. Some of the most important protests we have seen in Europe lately have been organized this way. What the networking does is allow for individuals without organizational or institutional support to organize in a new way.
The Facebook group started by an indivdual student at the University of Alberta grew exponentially and allowed a space not only for 210,000 people to indicate their anger at Harper's proroguing Parliament but also a for activists to begin organizing protests. In all my years of organizing, I have never seen a truly spontaneous protest like this.
Moreover, in a country like Canada, organizing a national demonstration without resources has been almost impossible. Even in the pro-choice movement in the 1980's, the most powerful movement of my life in Canada, we would not have been able to organize simultaneous protests in so many cities. It is the decentralization, the low level of entry, and the ability of anyone to call themselves part of the CAPP (Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament) as long as they oppose the Prorogue that makes it possible. So there were protests in dozens of small towns, a few cities around the world and even a single protester in Oman. The protests were organized differently in each city. In Toronto, there were no politicians permitted to speak, in Ottawa, the leaders of the Opposition parties were featured but the message was similar developed through online media. Social networking, this time through live reports on Twitter, also allowed the organizers to control the message including how many protested, more than 25,000.
Secondly, a new generation of leadership emerged through CAPP. Christopher White who started it all is an Anthropology grad student from University of Alberta. In Toronto it was three student activists, all three people of colour. In most places, it was individuals rather than organizations who organized events. The political parties came to support it late in the game with the exception of Elizabeth May from the Green Party who is the only leader who seems to understand social movement politics, followed by the Liberals and finally the NDP. The leadership was young but the participants were all ages.
Advertising
None of the usual suspects were involved. The unions came to support it near the end; although some union activists did. Even then there was little effort from the labour movement to really mobilize. The organizers in Toronto included the labour movement on the platform. Marie Kelly, the new secretary-treasurer of the Ontario Federation of Labour gave an excellent speech as did John Cartright of the Metro Labour Council, which was the only union group to really promote the rally, and there were small clusters of labour activists but not very many.
Hard to understand given the negative impact these protests have had on Harper's popularity. From being in striking range of a majority, the latest polls put the Tories in a dead heat with the Liberals and that was before the protests. It is the first real damage anyone has been able to inflict on Harper in some time. Talking to one union leader, it became clear that they thought it was a Liberal front so they held back, probably the same reason the NDP did. This reflects a failure to understand the new politics that are emerging with this generation and in particular how out of touch both the unions and the NDP are with how social networking operates. A few minutes on that CAPP Facebook group made it very clear, even early on that this was no Liberal front. First the Liberals are not that good or they would be doing better and second given the personal connections people use to spread the word on Facebook, it would have quickly become clear that it wasn't what it appeared to be.
But neither was there any visible presence of what we might call the Left. A few days ago I was at an organizing meeting for the People's Summit against the G8/G20 next June. I saw very few of those people at the rally and no sign of their organizations. It is true that the rally was not very radical. Demanding that Parliament get back to work is not the most revolutionary of demands. But the reality of the depoliticization created by neo-liberalism means that the biggest obstacle to any political or social change is the passivity of ordinary people. The fight for citizen participation in democracy is progressive. Bringing people into the streets again in these kinds of numbers is radical in the present context.
The leadershp of these protests was very clear that they wanted the broadest possible mobilization, including conservative democrats. That is the nature of a mass movement. The environmental movement, for example, includes a broad political spectrum from direct action anarchists to staid conservationists. The women's movement, especially in its early days, included Tory women like Laura Sabia as well as youthful radical activists. And any movement for greater democracy will include a broad spectrum of political views.
It is not clear yet if what will emerge from this is what I hope, a broad movement for more participatory democracy that would include reform to Parliament, as the NDP is proposing, reform to the electoral system as Fair Vote Canada proposes and more citizen participation as we are seeing throughout Latin America. I have argued for some time that deepening democracy will provide a path to more radical social and political demands so of course I was very excited about yesterday's protest. Not to mention that I haven't been able to give one of those rabble rousing speeches in a long time.
But it is certain that the young people who so brilliantly organized these rallies will not stop. Once you get a taste of people's power, it's hard to turn back from it. There is already a Facebook page on next steps


Thanks Judy for this very good analysis, much needed and certainly warranted.
I too attended the organizing meeting and was shocked to find a decidedly "anti-political" sentiment overall, not the usual suspects who gather to organize a rally or assembly that is, surely, political indeed.
But you end on what is the real sustaining note: that this more "general" assembly can be nothing but good, as it acts as a gateway for more civic involvement and attention. Also, as you point out, it shows up our lame-ass politicians for being so out-of-touch and near irrelevant, as it takes a grassroots movement arranged via facebook to take down Harper in the polls.
I believe the true value for this newfound use of social media is bound to follow. Our democracy is too far off the rails to be saved by any party, and it will inevitably come to a people's movement and grassroots uprising to save what we can. Whether this comes sooner or later, that is the question.
But one thing is for certain, and that is the inevitable role of CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE and DIRECT ACTION.
The "Canadian Civil Disobedience Network" is a new group on facebook designed to build a committed assembly country-wide that is educated and knowledgable re. the history, potential, and practice of peaceful, non-violent CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE. This is the PRAXIS for activism that we must dust off and re-inaugurate, sooner I hope, than later.
I would ask anybody reading this to please consider joining, and sharing the idea with your friends and networks.
Canadian Civil Disobedience Network: A Facebook Group
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=info&gid=230705449729
This is a forum to build support, to share knowledge, to grow a movement that understands the value and inevitable role of CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE in our future struggle to save our democracy and our civil liberties from further erosion at the hands of the global neo-con agenda.
It's simply wrong to equate mass popular protest with civil disobedience, as the aforementioned facebook group tries to do.
Civil disobedience involves law-breaking. It is not necessary, at the present stage of Canadian society, to engage in illegal activities in order to protest. In fact, civil disobedience is usually practised by the weak and marginalized; it is a sign of impotence. It substitutes individual acts of heroism or martyrdom for mass collective action. And there is nothing "inevitable" about it.
The anti-prorogue movement is broad and popular and capable of mobilizing thousands of people in peaceful, lawful protest. Acts of civil disobedience would be counterproductive to such mobilization.
Let's leave the illegalities to Harper and his police forces.
To M. Spector, respectfully:
You are wrong, so very wrong, in your opinion above. Perhaps you do not know or understand the history, use, and relevance of CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE. We would not have labour standards, HERE, in THIS COUNTRY, if it were not for CD. Women would not have the RIGHT TO VOTE, here, if not for CD. Your civil liberties that have amounted to this place, where you are now, blogging on this site, WOULD NOT BE AVAILABLE TO YOU if it were not for our forbears who used CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE to win these privileges in the face of oppressive power structures which CONSISTENTLY work to limit the rights and freedoms of the general, mass population.
CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE is warranted MORE THAN EVER in our so-called "first world" nations, as we are the buffer, the current standard, for what rights CAN BE WON and MAINTAINED, and thus we act as something of a SENTINEL for other, poorer, nations facing greater oppression and corruption.
Further, M. Spector, if you believe that such matters as working people's collective standards and rights and civil liberties (not to mention matters environmental, etc.) can and should be left to our "legitimate" bodies (legislature, courts, police, etc.) to rule and regulate, then clearly you have been sleeping through the last couple of decades. In which case perhaps it is your own privilege, and what you see through your special rosy glasses, that condemns you to your belief.
Anyone who says that CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE is the ONLY effective form of political protest either knows nothing of the HISTORY of political protest in this country, or is simply a PROVOCATEUR.
I am confident that anyone who chooses to review my position above will agree that at no time do I state that CD is the ONLY effective form of political protest. I do however state that CD will play an "inevitable role" in our future struggles to salvage democracy.
And here let me add to that: Civil disobedience has and always will be an ESSENTIAL ingredient in the people's movement toward civil society, humanism, and the common good.
Perhaps M. SPECTOR would care to engage further re. the history of civil disobedience in this country?