rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Elections Canada response to disinfo and robo-calls

Upon hearing credible reports of alleged disinformation and robo-calls disparaging candidates and misinforming voters of their polling locations in my city (London, Ontario), I formally submitted a complaint to Elections Canada. Yesterday (May 11, 2011), I received a response from Elections Canada (see below).

Regarding alleged disinformation calls (from inside or outside city or country):

Elections Canada response:

"Although the Canada Elections Act regulates many aspects of the federal electoral process, including advertising, nothing in the Act prohibits or regulates the use of telephone solicitation seeking support for a particular candidate or party, nor does anything regulate the content of such calls. This is the same whether the calls are made from within an electoral district, or from without. Consequently, no issue of compliance or enforcement arises from calls whose source is identified. This recognizes the role played by free speech in democratic debate, including speech of a highly partisan nature that some may find offensive."

For context see Embassy Magazine's article and the London Free Press article.

Regarding alleged robo-calls (from inside or outside city or country):

Elections Canada response:

"Your concern about press reports of "robo-calls" providing false information regarding polling stations is of a different character. Your remarks will be considered in the context of an inquiry ongoing with regard to calls of this nature that have been reported to this office."

For context see Dominion News article, CBC's recent article and audio of a robo-call and the London Free Press article.

Questions Canadians may want to consider:

1. In light of 21st century technological capabilities and the rise of American-style dirty tricks seeping into Canadian elections, should Canadians push parliament to give Elections Canada new powers to prohibit future eve-of-election slander by any political party or interest group (domestic or foreign)?

2. If Elections Canada can't or won't pursue the disinformation calls should other legal instruments (e.g., libel and slander law) be pursued?

3. Will journalists pursue the matter? Surely, with today's digital tracking technologies the origin of those making both the disinformation and robocalls can be determined and exposed.

4. Other questions???...

(Follow me on twitter: @MediatedJustice)



Thank you for reading this story...

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.

If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.

We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing in 2017.

Make a donation.Become a monthly supporter.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.