rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Cost of inequitable tax loopholes increases

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Finance Canada published its annual Tax Expenditure Report for 2011 and it shows that the cost of some of the most inequitable tax preferences and loopholes continues to rise.

For instance the stock option deduction, which allows CEOs and executives to pay tax at half the rate of ordinary working income, is estimated to cost the federal government $725 million last year.

I'd written about the major problems with this tax preference a number of times before. Not only is it highly inequitable, but it also fuels speculative behaviour and short-term behaviour.

Now even Roger Martin, dean of U of T's Rotman School of Management, says they should be eliminated, while well-known McGill business prof Henry Mintzberg wrote in the Wall Street Journal that they " represent the most prominent form of legal corruption that has been undermining our large corporations and bringing down the global economy."

Hugh Mackenzie's annual report on CEO incomes for the CCPA shows just how much stock options provide as part of total compensation for CEOs. Even the Globe and Mail's conservative columnist Margaret Wente has argued that they should be eliminated.

Analysis of the CRA's income tax statistics for 2009 shows that over 95 per cent of the value of this tax preference went to the 2 per cent of tax filers with incomes of over $150,000 and close to 90 per cent went to the less than 1 per cent of tax filers with incomes of over $250,000.

The cost of related tax preferences for capital gains also continued to increase. The half tax rate for capital gains in relation to personal income was estimated to cost $3.6 billion last year while the similar half tax rate for capital gains from corporate income is estimated to cost the federal government $3.9 billion last year. In total, the stock option deduction and preferential rates for capital gains cost the federal government over $8 billion a year. These tax preferences also cost provincial governments billions as they generally use the same tax base.

These tax preferences for stock options and capital gains were largely rationalized because it was argued that they would boost investment and thereby productivity and economic growth in the economy, as supply-side economist Herb Grubel argued a decade ago when the inclusion rate was reduced from 75 per cent to 50 per cent.

That clearly hasn't happened. It's time that the stock option deduction is completely eliminated and that capital gains are taxed at the full rate, after adjusting for inflation, as the CCPA's Alternative Federal Budget has argued for many years.

If the federal government followed the advice of AFB and these esteemed business professors, it would be many billions better off -- and we'd have a more equitable, stable and productive economy.

This article was first posted on The Progressive Economics Forum.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.