rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Canada must learn from its UN Security Council defeat

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Foreign Affairs Minister François-Philippe Champagne cast his vote in the UN Security Council election (Image: François-Philippe Champagne/Twitter)

In 2016, U.S. president Barack Obama famously said, "The world needs more Canada." Earlier this week, however, the world spoke for itself when it rejected Canada's candidacy for one of two open spots for a two-year non-permanent seat at the UN Security Council (UNSC). 

The vote was a resounding rebuke to the Trudeau government's public relations campaign for one of the coveted seats. Despite its membership in the G7 and G20, and its many alliances in the Americas, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, Canada (population 37 million) was beaten out by Norway (population 5.3 million) and Ireland (population 4.9 million).

It was yet another sign that despite the mythologies that Canada's political elite may spin, Canada has declined on the world stage. Canadians like to think of themselves as a benevolent, peace-loving presence in the world, but the reality is that for many countries, Canada's agenda of recent years seems little different from that of the U.S.

No doubt there are many reasons that Canada's campaign for a UNSC seat failed. Most analyses pointed out that Norway spends fully one per cent of its gross national income on international development assistance, as compared to Canada's 0.27 per cent. And for its part, Ireland has contributed far more to UN peacekeeping missions than Canada has in recent years. 

But there's also the sense that the Trudeau government lacks sincerity as it makes promises to invest in a better world. It talks about addressing climate change, but invests in oil pipelines and fails to meet its international climate targets. It signs on to the international Arms Trade Treaty, and provides humanitarian aid to Yemen, but fails to curb arms sales to Saudi Arabia, one of the worst human rights violators in the world. 

Results from an EKOS survey released this week demonstrate that Canadians expect substantive engagement from Canada on international files. A strong majority of Canadians feel the government should increase its commitment to combatting climate change, and a majority of Canadians feel the government should increase its contribution to international peacekeeping.

The instances of insincerity go on: the Trudeau government's failure to address centuries of disrespect of Indigenous rights; its failure to rein in rogue Canadian mining companies; its failure to counter U.S. militarism.

The elephant in the room, however, is Canada's embarrassing record of diplomatic cover for Israel's human rights violations.

In 2018, when speaking in Israel, Canada's then-foreign affairs minister Chrystia Freeland claimed that, were it successful in its bid for a UNSC seat, Canada would try to be an "asset for Israel." This assertion builds on years of one-sided voting at the UN -- under both Harper and Trudeau -- where Canada repeatedly joins Israel and the U.S. in a small minority to vote against resolutions seeking to hold Israel accountable for its human rights violations. 

More than any other act, Canada's attempt to protect Israel from international condemnation was embodied in its threat to cut funding to the International Criminal Court (ICC) if the court proceeded with a war crimes investigation against Israeli officials.

To be fair, the Trudeau government gives lip service to a negotiated solution to the conflict in Israel-Palestine. But since there have not been negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians since 2014, this is literally meaningless, especially to Palestinians living under a brutal Israeli military occupation

Indeed, frustration over the Trudeau government's absurd policy on Israel-Palestine grew so intense it resulted in a grassroots Canadian movement against Canada's UNSC bid! 

In the campaign directed toward the 193 UN delegations, over 100 Canadian organizations and dozens of prominent individuals urged countries to vote against Canada’s candidacy at the UNSC. And while the Canadian government did not want to concede that this grassroots campaign got much traction, a defensive letter in response last week from Canada's permanent representative to the UN belies any such claim. 

The EKOS poll last week demonstrated that, on the question of Israel-Palestine, not only is the Trudeau government out of step with the international community, it is also out of step with a majority of the members of the Liberal party, who want Canada to increase its support for Palestinian human rights.

The perplexing thing about Canada's support for powerful and militaristic interests is that it really works against Canada's long-term interests. As a middle power with a relatively small population, Canada depends on a multi-lateral, rules-based world system in order to thrive. 

As the arctic melts, for example, Canada's claim to its arctic territories is more solidly rooted in the protections of international law than in the protection provided through the Canadian Forces. As such, if Canada fails to stand up for the legitimate rights of average Palestinians, Saudis, Yemenis and others, it also whittles away at its own protections. 

In his concession speech after the UN vote, Foreign Affairs Minister François-Philippe Champagne claimed to have learned important lessons from the bid for the UNSC seat: "We convened, we listened and we learned from other countries around the world."

Let's hope he has. Otherwise, Canada seems destined to continue to undermine the very institutions that protect it, and may face yet another humiliating defeat the next time it vies for another UNSC seat. 

Thomas Woodley is president of Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME), a Canadian non-profit whose mission is to empower Canadians of all backgrounds to promote justice, development and peace in the Middle East.

Image: François-Philippe Champagne/Twitter

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.