Parliamentary supremacy and the Speaker's corner

This is the week the Speaker of the House of Commons rules on whether or not the Conservative government must release to Parliament the full text of documents in their possession concerning Canadian complicity in torture of detained Afghans. 

The issue at stake is the power of Parliament to require the prime minister and cabinet to make documents public. Can the Conservatives claim national security and dealings with foreign powers protect them from following a parliamentary directive?

The Conservatives did release heavily censored versions of the documents. They have engaged former Supreme Court Justice Frank Iacobucci to determine what constitutes legitimate criteria for not disclosing material requested by parliament. They have not yet claimed that governments are above the law.

Most people expect Speaker Peter Milliken, a Liberal, to sidestep the
issue of parliamentary supremacy; he may issue a rebuke to the Harper
government, but acknowledge the legitimacy of cabinet ministers making
their own secrecy determinations.

The three opposition parties argue Conservative ministers who failed to produce the documents are in contempt of parliament. In addressing their motion, the Speaker presumably must outline in what instances governments do not have to defer to the will of Parliament.

When Canadians elect their Parliament they are choosing more than
legislators to vote on bills. Parliamentarians decide who forms the
government. Canadian MPs are expected to hold the government
responsible to the people.

To watch Parliament you would think that members of the Conservative caucus were appointed by the prime minister not elected by their constituents. In the name of party discipline, members no longer make statements without approval of the Prime Minister's Office, either inside or outside the house.

Not just Conservative parliamentarians are affected by the ban on free speech. Canadian diplomats abroad, and public servants are not allowed to speak without first asking permission from the PMO apparatus.

The Conservatives have breached international law by handing over of Afghan detainees to be tortured, and should be prosecuted under the Geneva Convention, irrespective of the Speaker's ruling. We do not need additional proof or "secret" documents in order to arrive at that conclusion. But we do need to face the issue of disregard for parliament raised by the Harper government on a daily basis, irrespective of any crimes it has committed.

Conservative M.P.s consent silently to the implication of Canadians in torture, a war crime. Worse, they consent to keeping pertinent evidence to the crime secret from the people who elected them to oversee our government.

Richard Colvin is the Canadian diplomat who raised the issue of torture inside the government. He was called to testify before a parliamentary committee on what he knew, and when he knew it. While making his testimony, on orders of the Conservatives, he was denied access to his own emails.

A public servant called as a witness before a parliamentary committee and unable to access his own work while testifying? Even George Orwell did not imagine tyranny being that imaginative. Every Conservative MP deserves to be defeated in the next election.


Related Items

Thank you for reading this story...

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.

If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.

We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing.

Make a donation.Become a monthly supporter.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.